To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant differences between hip resurfacing arthroplasty and THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

No significant differences between hip resurfacing arthroplasty and THA

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:422| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial

BMJ. 2012 Apr 19;344

Contributing Authors:
Matthew L Costa Juul Achten Nicholas R Parsons Richard P Edlin Pedro Foguet Udai Prakash Damian R Griffin Young Adult Hip Arthroplasty team

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

126 adult patients with severe hip joint arthritis were randomized to receive either total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Results from 12 month follow-up indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to hip function, Harris Hip Score, and Oxford Hip Score. In addition, complication rates did not differ between the two groups, but there wa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue