To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intensive group training protocol no more effective than usual physiotherapy for CLBP

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

Intensive group training protocol no more effective than usual physiotherapy for CLBP

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:52| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Intensive group training protocol versus guideline physiotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1193-200. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

Contributing Authors:
Nicole van der Roer Maurits van Tulder Johanna Barendse Dirk Knol Willem van Mechelen Henrica de Vet

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

114 patients with non-specific low back pain of more than 12 weeks duration were randomized to receive physiotherapy according to intensive group exercise training protocol or usual dutch guideline based physiotherapy. No significant differences between both treatment groups on any of the outcome measures were detected during the complete follow-up period, with only one exception. After 26 weeks, ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue