To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No clinical benefit with the use of HA-coated pins in external fixation of the wrist

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

No clinical benefit with the use of HA-coated pins in external fixation of the wrist

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:367| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Hydroxyapatite-coated pins versus titanium alloy pins in external fixation at the wrist: A controlled cohort study

J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):845-51.

Contributing Authors:
O Pieske L Pichlmaier F Kaltenhauser N Schramm B Rubenbauer A Greiner S Piltz

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

40 patients with unstable wrist fracture to be treated with external fixators were randomized for the use of titanium pins (TI) or Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium pins (HA). Clinical evaluation of pin site with regard to erythema, drainage, pain value and radiological assessment for loosening at T1 (mean, 9 days), T2 (mean, 43 days), and T3 (mean, 56 days) was conducted. In the case of infection, a...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.