LOGIN
Real vs. Sham C0-C1 Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Restriction
March 2023
Real vs. Sham C0-C1 Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Restriction
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Are there differences between a real C0-C1 mobilization and a sham technique in function and pressure pain threshold in patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical restriction? A randomised controlled clinical trial.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(1): 61-70.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Twenty-eight patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical restriction were randomized to receive a single session of C0-C1 dorsal gliding manual therapy (n=14) or a sham treatment (n=14). The primary outcome of interest was the flexion-rotation test variable. Secondary outcomes included upper flexion-extension mobility, pain pressure threshold, and deep flexor muscle activation, measured imm...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.