LOGIN
3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis
June 2022
3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis at Midterm Follow-up: A Randomized Prospective Analysis
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6): 1486-1494.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Eighty-five patients with a long head of the biceps tendon pathology were randomized to receive open (n=43) or arthroscopic (n=42) suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE]). This was a mid term follow up study, with an average follow-up time of...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.