To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy vs. Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2022

Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy vs. Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Vol: 253| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 16;2022: 6033989.

Contributing Authors:
X Xu C Chen Y Tang F Wang Y Wang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Twelve randomized controlled trials with a total of 2,797 patients were included in this meta-analysis comparing percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and traditional open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. The pooled outcomes of interest included the likelihood of post-operative paresthesia, direct nerve root damage, disc recurrence, and intraoperative hemorrhage/hematoma. The results of this me...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue