To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Minimal Incision, Multifidus-sparing Microendoscopic Diskectomy vs. Conventional Microdiskectomy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2022

Minimal Incision, Multifidus-sparing Microendoscopic Diskectomy vs. Conventional Microdiskectomy

Vol: 171| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Minimal Incision, Multifidus-sparing Microendoscopic Diskectomy Versus Conventional Microdiskectomy for Highly Migrated Intracanal Lumbar Disk Herniations

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11): 805-813.

Contributing Authors:
Mohamed Hussein

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-three patients with highly migrated intracanal disc herniations were randomized to receive a minimal incision, multifidus-sparing microendoscopic discectomy (n=37) or a conventional open discectomy (n=36). Outcomes of interest included surgical outcomes, pain on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), function on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the rate of complications, assessed up to 2 ye...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.

Continue