LOGIN
COA 2021: Comparing Dual Plate vs Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures
June 2021
COA 2021: Comparing Dual Plate vs Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Outcomes and Complications After Dual Plate vs. Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
COA_2021_1Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Seven studies including 255 patients with mid-shaft clavicle fractures were included in this meta-analysis comparing single-plate fixation to dual-plate fixation. Pooled outcomes of interest included the implant removal rate and the rate of fracture non-union. Results revealed a significantly lower pooled implant removal rate in the dual-plate group compared to the single-plate group (OR=3.91, p=0...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.