To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Improves Function & QoL in FAI Patients Compared to Physiotherapy

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites

Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Improves Function & QoL in FAI Patients Compared to Physiotherapy

Vol: 9| Issue: 11| Number:32| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Arthroscopic surgery versus physiotherapy for femoroacetabular impingement: a meta-analysis study.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Oct;30(7): 1151-1162.

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

A total of 3 randomized controlled trials with 644 patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were included in this meta-analysis comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to physiotherapy treatment. The outcomes of interest included the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) subscale of Activities of Daily Living, International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) scores, the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sports subscale, and the risk of a future total hip arthroplasty (THA). All pooled outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 14.67 (SD 8.3) months, and iHOT33 scores was also measured at both 6 and 12 months follow-up. The pooled results demonstrated that EQ-5D VAS (p=0.03), HOS-ADL (p<0.0001), HOS-Sports (p=0.0003), and iHOT 33 scores were all statistically significantly in favour of the arthroscopic surgery group compared to the control at the mean of 14.67 months follow-up. Furthermore, iHOT33 scores were statistically significantly in favour of the arthroscopic group at 12 months (p=0.0002) follow-up, but not at 6 months (p=0.70). The risk of THA was not statistically significantly different between the two treatments (p=0.72).

Publication Funding Details

Funding
Not funded
Funding Details
No external source of funding was used.
Disclosures
None disclosed

Why was this study needed now?

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can damage the joints, thus causing pain and decreasing daily activities. Furthermore, FAI has been predicted to be responsible for approximately 1 in 2 cases of hip osteoarthritis. Management includes traditional physiotherapy as well as arthroscopic surgery. However, a lack of consensus remains on whether surgery proves more efficacious compared to traditional physiotherapy especially since surgery is associated with increased risk of complications.

What was the principal research question?

In patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), how does physiotherapy compare to arthroscopic treatment with respect to functional and pain outcomes and progression to osteoarthritis?

What were the important study characteristics?

Population

644

Total Sample Size

Patients with femoroacetabular impingement scheduled for arthroscopic surgery or conservative treatment.
Intervention

Arthroscopy

Mean age 33.83. Mean BMI 27.01. 44% male. Patients received hip arthroscopy.
Comparison

Physical Therapy

Mean age 33.75. Mean BMI 27.03. 54% male. Patients received conservative treatment (physiotherapy).
Outcomes
EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) VAS score

Quality of Life (QoL)
Lower = Better
Scale: 0.0 to 100.0

Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living

Function
Higher = Better
Scale: 0.0 to 100.0

Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sports

Function
Higher = Better

International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33)

Disease-specific Index
Higher = Better
Scale: 0.0 to 100.0

Incidence of revision to total hip arthroplasty

Technical Success
Lower = Better

Methods
Meta-analysis
Time
None Months

Outcomes: Disease-specific Index, Function, Quality of Life (QoL), Technical Success

Risk of Bias
Confidence in the results: Low

Risk of Bias

Yes
Partial Yes
No
Protocol registered before commencement of the review
Adequacy of the literature search
Justification for excluding individual studies
Risk of bias from individual studies being included in the review
Appropriateness of meta-analytical methods
Consideration of risk of bias when interpreting the results of the review
Assessment of presence and likely impact of publication bias
Confidence in the results: Low

What were the important findings?

Significantly Better
No Difference
Significantly Better
Physical Therapy
Arthroscopy
MD: Mean Difference; SMD: Standardized Mean Difference; OR: Odds Ratio, RR: Risk Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval

What should I remember most and how will this affect the care of my patients?

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that arthroscopic surgery can improve function and quality of life for patients with femoroacetabular impingement when compared to physiotherapy. However, this meta-analysis had only 3 studies included which can bias the findings and the short follow-up periods where long-term outcomes need to be evaluated.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue