To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No Difference in Pain and Function with a Direct Anterior Approach vs Posterior Approach in THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2020

No Difference in Pain and Function with a Direct Anterior Approach vs Posterior Approach in THA

Vol: 9| Issue: 12| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Can J Surg. Sep-Oct 2020;63(5):E412-E417

Contributing Authors:
K Moerenhout P Derome GY Laflamme S Leduc HS Gaspard B Benoit

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-five patients with osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis scheduled for a total hip arthroplasties (THA) were randomized into receiving THA via the direct anterior approach (n=28) or posterior approach (n=27). The primary outcome of interest included the hospital length of stay. The secondary outcomes included function measured by Harris Hip Score (HHS), pain measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VA...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue