To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing Wear Rate Between Vitamin E Infused HXLPE vs UHMWPE Acetabular Cups in Primary THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2020

Comparing Wear Rate Between Vitamin E Infused HXLPE vs UHMWPE Acetabular Cups in Primary THA

Vol: 9| Issue: 7| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

2-year results of an RCT of 2 uncemented isoelastic monoblock acetabular components: lower wear rate with vitamin E blended highly cross-linked polyethylene compared to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene

Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):254-259

Contributing Authors:
JHJ van Erp JRA Massier JJ Halma TE Snijders A de Gast

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and ninety-nine patients scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a Vitamin E infused highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) acetabular cup or an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cup. The primary outcome of interest was wear rate measured by femoral head penetration rate. Secondary outcomes of interest included pain at rest...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue