To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between subscapularis tenotomy and peel in patients undergoing anatomic TSA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2020

No difference between subscapularis tenotomy and peel in patients undergoing anatomic TSA

Vol: 9| Issue: 5| Number:9| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:2

A randomized controlled trial comparing subscapularis tenotomy with peel in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):225-234.

Contributing Authors:
P Lapner T Zhang S Ruggiero A Sheikh GS Athwal JW Pollock F Momoli

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred patients with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis scheduled for a anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) were randomized to receive subscapularis tendon management via a subscapularis tenotomy or peel procedure. The primary outcome of interest was the internal rotation strength of the shoulder at 24 months post-operation. Secondary outcomes of interest included the Wester Ontario ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue