To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Gait analysis with interdisciplinary treatment does not improve outcomes in cerebral palsy children

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2019

Gait analysis with interdisciplinary treatment does not improve outcomes in cerebral palsy children

Vol: 8| Issue: 11| Number:22| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Gait analysis for individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Oct;61(10):1189-1195.

Contributing Authors:
HM Rasmussen NW Pedersen S Overgaard LK Hansen U Dunkhase-Heinl Y Petkov V Engell A Holsgaard-Larsen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty children with cerebral palsy receiving individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions were randomized to receive a 4-step gait analysis as part of the baseline assessment or no gait analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the Gait Deviation Index (GDI). Secondary outcomes of interest included the 1 minute walk test, the mobility scale of the pediatric evaluation of disability in...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue