To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Omitting x-rays after the 2-week mark is non-inferior to routine imaging in distal radius fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2019

Omitting x-rays after the 2-week mark is non-inferior to routine imaging in distal radius fractures

Vol: 8| Issue: 9| Number:29| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Omitting Routine Radiography of Traumatic Distal Radial Fractures After Initial 2-Week Follow-up Does Not Affect Outcomes

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:1342-1350. 10.2106/JBJS.18.01160

Contributing Authors:
P van Gerven M El Moumni WP Zuidema SM Rubinstein P Krijnen MW van Tulder IB Schipper MF Termaat

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Distal radius fractures are at risk of failed reduction following either operative or non-operative treatment. For this reason, many surgeons routinely perform repeated radiographs throughout the follow-up period. It is unclear, however, whether more frequent imaging actually affects management or outcomes. Thus. the authors randomized 386 patients to routine care (X-rays at 1, 2, 6, and 12 weeks)...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue