To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar Radiographic Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty through Direct Anterior vs Lateral Approach

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2019

Similar Radiographic Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty through Direct Anterior vs Lateral Approach

Vol: 8| Issue: 9| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(8):1718-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.003

Contributing Authors:
OL Brun HN Sund L Nordsletten SM Rohrl KE Mjaaland

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

The authors of this study randomized 164 patients to direct anterior (DAA) or direct lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded. They assessed radiographic outcomes on the immediate post-operative X-ray. Outcomes included cement mantle thickness, cup positioning (inclination and anteversion), femoral stem position (on AP and lateral views), off...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue