To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Favourable pain relief, less opioid-related AEs with LIA vs. intrathecal morphine after TKR surgery

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2019

Favourable pain relief, less opioid-related AEs with LIA vs. intrathecal morphine after TKR surgery

Vol: 8| Issue: 8| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia vs. intrathecal morphine after total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):264-271.

Contributing Authors:
G Iohom G Shorten D McCarthy J McNamara J Galbraith F Loughnane

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

53 patients scheduled for a unilateral total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive local infiltration analgesia with levobupivacaine and adrenaline, or intrathecal preservative-free morphine in conjunction with the spinal anesthesia. The primary outcomes of interest were pain scores at 24 hours at rest and on passive flexion to 30deg, measured on a Visual Analog Scale...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue