To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ciNPWT may reduce wound complications and re-operation rate in patients undergoing revision TJA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2019

ciNPWT may reduce wound complications and re-operation rate in patients undergoing revision TJA

Vol: 8| Issue: 6| Number:6| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Use of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Infection: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):554-559.

Contributing Authors:
WK Barsoum AK Klika RM Molloy JM Newman MBP Siqueira CA Higuera

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

160 patients scheduled for a total joint arthroplasty (hip/knee) were randomized to receive either a closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT; PREVENA) device or a standard-of-care silver-impregnated occlusive wound dressing. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of wound complications. Secondary outcomes included the rates or re-admission and re-operation. Follow up was...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue