To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Topical TXA superior to placebo in reducing blood loss after instrumented posterior spinal fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2019

Topical TXA superior to placebo in reducing blood loss after instrumented posterior spinal fusion

Vol: 8| Issue: 5| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma Undergoing Long-Segment Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion

Asian Spine J. 2019 Feb;13(1):146-154.

Contributing Authors:
W Sudprasert T Tanaviriyachai K Choovongkomol S Jongkittanakul U Piyapromdee

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients between the ages of 18-70 with thoracolumbar spinal injuries and scheduled for long segment instrumented posterior spinal fusion surgeries with local autologous bone grafts were randomized to receive topical tranexamic acid (TXA) or a placebo solution for the control of blood loss and need for transfusion. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative packed red blood cell transfu...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue