To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between high-flex versus standard tibial component dish design in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

No difference between high-flex versus standard tibial component dish design in TKA

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:23| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

No differences in patient-reported outcomes between medial pivot insert and symmetrical insert in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized analysis

Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1254-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.005

Contributing Authors:
S Nakamura K Nishitani M Furu S Kuriyama M Ishikawa H Ito S Matsuda

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

58 patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty, and randomized to either a high-flexion tibial tray with an asymmetric medial pivot design, which involved a dish medial compartment and flat lateral compartment, or a standard symmetrical dish tibial tray. Patients were assessed for knee range of motion and clinical scores after 3 weeks and 2 year...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue