To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Statistically significant but not clinically relevant reduction in pain with PAI vs placebo in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2018

Statistically significant but not clinically relevant reduction in pain with PAI vs placebo in THA

Vol: 7| Issue: 11| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No Clinically Important Difference in Pain Scores After THA Between Periarticular Analgesic Injection and Placebo: A Randomized Trial

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Sep;476(9):1837-1845. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000374

Contributing Authors:
M Matsubara N Hirasawa T Nakayama S Tsukada K Kurosaka M Nishino

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

40 patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty were randomized to have one hip treated with periarticular infiltration analgesia (PAI) and the other hip administered placebo. The purpose of this study was to compare pain scores between hips over the first 7 days after surgery. Statistically significant lower pain scores were observed among hips treated with PAI within the ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue