To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No apparent benefit of PSI over standard instrumentation for clinical or radiological outcome in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

No apparent benefit of PSI over standard instrumentation for clinical or radiological outcome in TKA

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:39| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2788-2796. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4741-1

Contributing Authors:
F Lampe T Pfitzner H Hommel CJ Marques U Maus D Scheunemann D Lazovic D Vogel M Haunschild

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

157 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to surgery completed with either the use of patient specific instrumentation or standard instrumentation. Patients were assessed at 3 months postoperatively, with the primary outcome being the rate of outliers in coronal lower limb alignment, defined as a deviation of 3 or more degrees from neutral. Results demonstrated a significa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue