To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Short-term function better with arthroscopic release vs. hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Short-term function better with arthroscopic release vs. hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:101| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic capsular release versus hydrodilatation in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1401-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.002

Contributing Authors:
C Smith J Evans W Thomas JC Beazley D Silver S Gallacher R Anaspure A Redfern J Kitson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder were randomized to either arthroscopic capsular release or hydrodilitation under fluoroscopy. Primary outcome was function on the Oxford Shoulder Score, while secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life and shoulder range of motion. Follow-up was scheduled for 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Results demonstrated significantly greater OSS,...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue