To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant difference for improvement of erosive hand OA pain between adalimumab and placebo

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

No significant difference for improvement of erosive hand OA pain between adalimumab and placebo

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:14| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of HUMira (adalimumab) for erosive hand OsteoaRthritis - the HUMOR trial

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jul;26(7):880-887. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.899

Contributing Authors:
LL Laslett G Jones N Bellamy P Bird D Aitken F Pan IK Haugen P Otahal

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

43 patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis were included in a crossover, randomized design to evaluate the efficacy of adalimumab as a treatment option. Patients were randomized to the order in which they received intervention with either adalimumab or placebo for 12 weeks. There was an 8-week washout period between treatment phases. Improvement in patient-reported pain, stiffness, and function ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue