To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Decompression of no statistical benefit over sham, and no clinical benefit over exercise for SIS

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

Decompression of no statistical benefit over sham, and no clinical benefit over exercise for SIS

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial

BMJ. 2018 Jul 19;362:k2860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2860

Contributing Authors:
M Paavola J Ranstam V Savolainen TL Järvinen J Kalske K Kanto A Malmivaara S Taimela J Inkinen I Sinisaari

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

210 patients with shoulder impingement syndrome were randomized to one of three treatment groups: arthroscopic subacromial decompression, diagnostic arthroscopy (sham surgery), or an exercise therapy program. Primary outcomes were pain at rest and pain during activity, and follow-up was performed over 24 months. Analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences in pain scores between ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue