Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
ACE Report #10284
Ace Report Cover Hand & Wrist

90-day and 1-year cost estimates of ORIF versus percutaneous pinning for displaced DRF

Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of Direct Perioperative Costs in Treatment of Unstable Distal Radial Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 May 2;100(9):786-792

Contributing Authors: TD Rozental SV Nandyala AM Giladi AM Parker

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


44 patients with an displaced, extraarticular distal radius fracture were randomized to fixation through either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar plate, or to closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). The purpose of the current study was to compare direct hospital costs and establish cost ratio during the perioperative period, after 90 days of follow-up, and after 1 ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.


Please Login or Join to leave comments.