To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2018

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Vol: 7| Issue: 4| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):572-576

Contributing Authors:
Y Ma H. Wang CC Piper AJ Hughes AS Neviaser

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Three randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis comparing pain and functional improvement between operative and nonoperative treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Follow-up was 12 months in each study. Results demonstrated that while statistically significant differences in favour of the operative treatment compared to the nonoperative treatment were observed for ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue