Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:7 Issue:6 Number:4 ISSN#:2563-5476
RCT
ACE Report #10047
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

Migration of cemented versus uncemented, hydroxyapatite fixation in total knee arthroplasty


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Migration of cemented versus uncemented, hydroxyapatite fixation in total knee arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2018;7(6):4. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/10047

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated versus cemented total knee arthroplasty : five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis (RSA)

Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1467-1476

Contributing Authors: S Toksvig-Larsen ER Valstar KT van Hamersveld PJ Marang-van de Mheen R Tsonaka

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either uncemented fixation with hydroxyapatite-coated components, or to cement fixation. Patients were assessed for component migration via maximum total point motion using radiostereometric analysis. Results demonstrated significantly greater total MTPM after 5 years in the uncemented group compared to the cemented group, but no...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.