LOGIN
AAOS2018: Comparing nonoperative, hemiarthroplasty, ORIF and rTSA for 3- and 4-part humerus fracture
March 2018
AAOS2018: Comparing nonoperative, hemiarthroplasty, ORIF and rTSA for 3- and 4-part humerus fracture
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Comparison of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments for 3 and 4-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Eight randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis comparing four different treatment options for 3- and 4-part humeral fractures in elderly patients: nonoperative management, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The body of literature allowed comparison of rTSA to only HA, while nonoperative treatme...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.